The original goal of SegWit2x was to bring together the warring factions into a compromise and avoid a chain split. The dream was that by giving everyone what they wanted, we could restore unity to the community. However, Core won't budge one iota. They're adamant about SegWit1x being the one-and-only Bitcoin forever, even if they have to petition the U.S. government to use prevent SegWit2x from using the Bitcoin name and ticker symbol. The SegWit2x implementation was bungled by not enforcing the SegWit and 2x change to happen in the same block. Realizing that banker-funded BlockstreamCore would never compromise, those who understood Satoshi's vision forked off Bitcoin (Cash) before SegWit activated. Turns out they were right, and now we're facing a second split. So what makes sense going forward?
On the one hand, you have SegWit1x, with slow and expensive transactions, which no real-life users want, firmly controlled by the banker-funded developers and their army of censors and trolls, somehow retaining the Bitcoin ticker symbol and name, which is exactly what the bankers wanted -- a crippled Bitcoin that doesn't work.
You also have Bitcoin (Cash), which follows Satoshi's vision, operating properly, but relegated to the world of altcoins by the constant barrage of social media attacks by the well-funded banker troll army.
Then there's SegWit2x, an abomination which includes the banker-written poison pill, no long-term scaling solution beyond 2x, and currently undergoing one of the worst banker-funded assaults in the history of social media. It's not a solution to anything. SegWit was a bad idea from the start (which is why btc has grown to have more than 66,000 subscribers), and 2x is too little, too late.
SegWit2x had one goal, to prevent a chain split. It not only failed to achieve that purpose, but it has actually caused two chain splits. It could not possibly have been a bigger failure, and I cannot understand why it still has any support at all! The solution going forward should be this:
Let BlockstreamCore have their crippled, SegWit1x, which has no promise for the future. It's plainly obvious that SegWit alone was never a scaling solution, and the Lightning Network is vaporware.
Forget SegWit2x, as it solves nothing.
Those who want Bitcoin to succeed should rally behind Bitcoin (Cash), the version that most closely adheres to the original vision of Bitcoin, as described in the white paper. This is the Bitcoin you are looking for!
01-29 02:03 - 'AFAIK it’s real. But this just proves my point that I don’t care about a fork. Because I don’t know a thing about diamond besides that it exists and it’s on cmc. It’s the tactics used by the bcash crowd that are abhorr...' by /u/Pixaritdidnthappen removed from /r/Bitcoin within 0-9min
''' AFAIK it’s real. But this just proves my point that I don’t care about a fork. Because I don’t know a thing about diamond besides that it exists and it’s on cmc. It’s the tactics used by the bcash crowd that are abhorrent. Not the act of creating a fork. My hell they even use the bitcoin ticker symbol for their sub. It’s sad. They need to move on but almost every post in that sub is about this sub or bitcoin and not their alt coin. ''' Context Link Go1dfish undelete link unreddit undelete link Author: Pixaritdidnthappen
04-25 17:26 - 'I’m glad there is a place like r/btc because it allows free and open discussion. Bitcoin Cash is a fork of Bitcoin, and to some they feel it’s more Bitcoin than the Bitcoin that has the ticker symbol BTC. Why not let th...' by /u/shinyspirtomb removed from /r/Bitcoin within 511-521min
''' I’m glad there is a place like btc because it allows free and open discussion. Bitcoin Cash is a fork of Bitcoin, and to some they feel it’s more Bitcoin than the Bitcoin that has the ticker symbol BTC. Why not let them discuss Bitcoin Cash and express their opinions? Even if BCH goes against your personal opinions, the idea of stopping their discussion reeks of censorship. ''' Context Link Go1dfish undelete link unreddit undelete link Author: shinyspirtomb
Bitcoin on Twitter: "The whitepaper never gave Bitcoin a ticker symbol. Bitcoin is an idea, BTC is one implementation of that idea. Which Bitcoin fork do you think most closely resembles the Bitcoin described in the whitepaper?"
Remider (for Headaches) : BitCoin got created about 12y ago and launched 11y ago - Nothing to do with any TICKER SYMBOL!
Sadly many ppl want to 'binary' reduce all things esp complex one into their little box thinkin - so they are capable only to box BitCoin into a ticker - bag, just happy hodling that one. Never want to think what that BitCoin thingy is all about, cause that would just make too much head ache. BitCoin is just so much more, it is so much as BitCoin wants itself to be - no singel human beeing is able to box that into single brain handy thing. Cool to help anyone to get new BitCoin-Headaches - sorry ;)
Shame on you Binance for not changing the ticker symbol for Bitcoin Cash from BCC to BCH. It's been a year now and yet nothing happens. BCH is #4 total market cap. What are your reasons for leaving it as BCC?
Shame on you Binance for not changing the ticker symbol for Bitcoin Cash from BCC to BCH. It's been a year now and yet nothing happens. BCH is #4 total market cap and this alone should be enough reason to list it with its correct ticker which is BCH. There's already a lot of confusion regarding the BTC and BCH. Naming BCH as BCC just creates more for newcomers. Binance what are your reasons for leaving it as BCC? Jager_Binance
Hilarious ChannelBSV show. This is my 3rd ticker symbol as a Bitcoiner. I ain't gonna give bullshiters, tricksters & con-artists any time. I call out all this bullshit about RIPEMD-160 to the guy spreading it! (links in comments)
Olivier Janssens: "After years of smallblock-biased market manipulation, Bitfinex has finally changed the ticker symbol for Bitcoin Cash from the intentionally confusing and derogatory “BAB” to “BCH”. It *only* required the NYAG, DOJ, CFTC to investigate them for fraud first"
VITALIK Buterin - "The BCH community should NOT compromise with Craig Wright to "avoid a split" and should embrace it as an opportunity to conclusively ostracize and reject him. Bitcoin Craig (BCC) can go take the ticker symbol from the now-defunct cryptocurrency to which it is a fitting successor."
Bitfinex is apparently under investigation for market manipulation and they still have the audacity to manipulate & discredit Bitcoin Cash by assigning the ridiculous “BAB” ticker symbol to it. I have linked articles I wrote on their biased split tokens.
"Up until 2017 bitcoin used the ticker symbol BTC. It was still hijacked by a bunch of developers but it hadn't forked off. In the middle of 2017 the core development team altered the protocol creating a separate airdrop coin... BTC is not bitcoin"
It seems Binance will list Bitcoin Cash officially as 2 separate coins: Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHABC) and Bitcoin Cash SV (BCHSV) so there is no Bitcoin Cash (BCH). It seems to me CZ is trolling the community again with the ticker symbol, I'm not sure if he does it on purpose or he's kinda a retard.
09-21 19:53 - 'The most prominent example for an imitator is (seg)witcoin, which obviously was already known in 2010 but nobody could have seen it overtake the btc ticker symbol' by /u/tarnschaf1337 removed from /r/Bitcoin within 391-401min
Ticker symbols are determined by exchanges. For example, CZ & Binance choose to assign the BCC ticker symbol to Bitcoin Cash, instead of BCH. Bittrex originally used ticker symbol BCC for Bitcoin Cash, but later switched to BCH. Exchanges can assign whatever ticker symbol they want.
Initially, CoinEx.com will probably be the only place to trade BSV. If you have any BCH sitting at CoinEx, you'll receive some BSV forked coins, at a 1:1 ratio. By selling BSV, and buying BCH, we can drive the BSV market price to near zero. This will encourage independent miners to mine BCH, not the near worthless BSV. After a few days, near worthless BSV will be trading at maybe 1 cent, while BCH will be trading at ~$400. So all the executives at wallets & exchanges & payment processors will see that the market has rejected Fake Satoshi's BSV as a scam coin, the market will have spoken, BSV will be near worthless, and BCH will remain recognized as BCH, while BSV will go into the dustbin of history. This is just one way the BCH community can unite, vote by trading, and defend the Bitcoin Cash ecosystem from being destroyed by Craig Wright & nChain. https://www.yours.org/content/summary-of-ticker-symbols--bch--vs--bsv---bitcoin-cash-vs-bitcoin-sv--808ed4f2fdbf
Hey since two-letter symbols are allowed (see "SC" for SiaCoin) why not use simply "BC" for "Bitcoin Cash" instead of BCC (since it's conflicting with BitConnect) This is SHORT, SIMPLE and DIRECT just like Bitcoin Cash's simple and direct approach to the scaling debate (just raise block size rather than changing and complicating everything via segwit etc). At first, BC can stand for "B"itcoin "C"ash, for now... but then when it becomes dominant it'll just stand for simply "B"it"C"oin again :) Yeah, I know it's a pain in the ass to change things once people have already started using "BCC"... BUT it will be a lot HARDER to change this once the coin actually launches and exists. This whole Bitcoin Cash thing is happening so fast, mistakes are bound to be made and I think "BCC" was a mistake. The community can FIX this if this idea goes viral, FAST...!! Gentlemen! Fire Up Your Mouses and Click! Click! Click! to get this going!! P.S. I searched around on coinmarketcap and coincap, google, etc and did not find any other crypto using "BC" yet... if anyone knows otherwise please post but it DOES appear to be unused!!
Das Bitcoin-Symbol kann wie im ersten Satz dieser Seite als Bild eingefügt werden. Der Vorteil dieser Methode ist, dass jeder Client, der Bilder mit Text anzeigen kann, das Symbol anzeigen kann. Der Nachteil dieser Methode ist, dass sie sich als Bild nicht immer so gut wie eine Schrift verschlechtert. Bei der Verwendung von Rasterbildern kann das Skalieren des Bilds nach oben / unten (an ... Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) Stock Quotes - Nasdaq offers stock quotes & market activity data for US and global markets. In Bitcoin's early years (prior to 2013), the BTC ticker symbol was commonly used as a shorthand for Bitcoin. It's a clear and logical abbreviation for Bitcoin. All people have to do is buy shares through their regular broker using the ticker symbol. Each share represents about one-tenth of a bitcoin. But, as fellow Fool Jordan Wathen recently Each share ... Bei „Bitcoin‘ wäre das Ticker-Symbol „BTC“, bei Ethereum wäre es „ETH“. Die Länge des Ticker-Symbols ist dabei nicht begrenzt, hat aber üblicherweise die Länge von 3-5 Zeichen. So können Börsen „Handelspaare“ listen, die nicht nur hübscher, sondern auch platzsparender angezeigt werden. Statt Bitcoin/Ethereum verwenden Börsen BTC/ETH. Hier kann man also Bitcoin gegen ...
That markets choose to identify a particular network with a particular ticker symbol does not make that network “The Real Bitcoin.” That a particular network is more usable as peer-to-peer ... Bitcoin Head & Shoulders Pattern Worth Watching + Alt Coin Update - Duration: ... How to Link a Ticker Symbol Throughout thinkorswim Desktop Software - Duration: 4 minutes, 51 seconds. 2,880 views ... - Bitcoin (ticker symbol BTC on exchanges) will be halving in roughly 1 day - This will be the 3rd Bitcoin Halving Bitcoin is decentralized because of millions of peer-to-peer nodes creating a ... Robert Kiyosaki Interview: Blockchain technology, AI, Crypto, Bitcoin BTC Halving 2020 Robert Kiyosaki ... What is a Ticker Symbol Definition and Meaning - Duration: 2:37. Sasha Evdakov ... Bittrex: "we plan to use BCH as the ticker symbol and “Bcash” as the descriptive name to avoid confusion with Bitcoin." The token distribution methodology will be: - All BTC wallet balances ...